I have paying a consistent passing interest to the actual content of the Presidential debates and have noticed how the notion of "change" is so prominent in much of the content of discussion. Edwards and Obama chided Clinton last night in New Hampshire for being an establishment candidate, which she in fact is, more than the others save for Richardson perhaps, but he doesn't count so much for obvious reasons.
Anyhow, the clip below came to mind. Mostly for how Republicans might see Hillary's candidacy. However the same is applicable, perhaps more so to Romney (particularly if you're Lawrence O'Donnell). It all depends on what side of the isle your standing in. This isn't to condemn Hillary, mind you. This is just my strange effort to entertain a broader audience. So, try and enjoy.
Bour•geois n. 1. Of, relating to, or typical of the middle class. 2. Held to be preoccupied with respectability and material values. Deviant adj. 1. One that differs from a norm, especially a person whose behavior and attitudes differ from accepted social standards.
The BD explores the space between the status quo and what the BD considers "good" outside of it. Hopefully something posted here will make you think, change your mind or, best of all, enrage you. Call it an outlet.